Cool for looking at the Sun, although I think SK was changed to be more specialized towards hunting supernovae. There's also sky surveys like IceCube does. [0] And for terrestrial sources (geoneutrinos) from natural and artificial sources, there are/were efforts that could detect terrestrial reactors in operation like AGM2015. [1] Irrespective of the current geopolitical instability, I'm surprised that the IAEA doesn't have its own network of geoneutrino detectors to proactively look for proliferation concerns. 0. https://neutrino-map.science/ (ICNO) 1. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep13945 (KamLAND and frmr Borexino)
AGM2015: Antineutrino Global Map 2015
S.M. Usman, G.R. Jocher, S.T. Dye, W.F. McDonough, J.G. Learned
2015 · Scientific Reports
- HN score
- 0
- Mentions
- 3
- Readers
- 3
- Months
- 3
From the abstract
AbstractEvery second greater than 1025 antineutrinos radiate to space from Earth, shining like a faint antineutrino star. Underground antineutrino detectors have revealed the rapidly decaying fission products inside nuclear reactors, verified the long-lived radioactivity inside our planet and informed sensitive experiments for probing fundamental physics. Mapping the anisotropic antineutrino flux and energy spectrum advance geoscience by defining the amount and distribution of radioactive power within Earth while critically evaluating competing compositional models of the planet. We present the Antineutrino Global Map 2015 (AGM2015), an experimentally informed model of Earth’s surface antineutrino flux over the 0 to 11 MeV energy spectrum, along with an assessment of systematic errors. The open source AGM2015 provides fundamental predictions for experiments, assists in strategic detector placement to determine neutrino mass hierarchy and aids in identifying undeclared nuclear reactors. We use cosmochemically and seismologically informed models of the radiogenic lithosphere/mantle combined with the estimated antineutrino flux, as measured by KamLAND and Borexino, to determine the Earth’s total antineutrino luminosity at "Equation missing". We find a dominant flux of geo-neutrinos, predict sub-equal crust and mantle contributions, with ~1% of the total flux from man-made nuclear reactors.
Metadata: Crossref. Abstracts retain their original authors’ rights.
In the conversation
Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels
3 selected excerpts · 3 total mentions
This is not measured data but expected total antineutrino emissions according to the model that they created ((anti)neutrinos come in three different flavors and can oscillate between them). It looks like they modeled different sources like Earth's crust, mantle and artificial sources (nuclear reactors) separately, e.g. by using known distributions and ratios of radioactive elements or locations and power of nuclear reactors and in one case actual measurements by detectors in Italy and Japan. They then ran simulations on this and summed up the total flux in different energy ranges ("bins"). https://www.nature.com/articles/srep13945#Sec7
I'm a bit fascinated by this Ultralytics. It has super nice website but according to LinkedIn, I think it's just one guy who does consultancy. The intriguing part is that he has also done research in particle physics (as Ulatrlytics) that has been published in Nature [1]. I had never seen anything like that. [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/srep13945
Keep following the thread.
More in PhysicsMore from the same topics.
The Ghost in the Quantum Turing Machine
Scott Aaronson
In honor of Alan Turing's hundredth birthday, I unwisely set out some thoughts about one of Turing's obsessions throughout his life, the question of physics and free will.
Expanding Confusion: common misconceptions of cosmological horizons and the superluminal expansion of the Universe
Tamara M. Davis, Charles H. Lineweaver
We use standard general relativity to illustrate and clarify several common misconceptions about the expansion of the Universe.
Ultimate physical limits to computation
Seth Lloyd
Computers are physical systems: what they can and cannot do is dictated by the laws of physics.
There are no particles, there are only fields
Art Hobson
Quantum foundations are still unsettled, with mixed effects on science and society.