Skip to content
Back to the collection

The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter

Latham Boyle, Kieran Finn, Neil Turok

2018 · arXiv

Read the paper
HN score
0
Mentions
3
Readers
3
Months
3
What’s in a score?

From the abstract

We investigate the idea that the universe before the Big Bang is the $CPT$ reflection of the universe after the bang, both classically and quantum mechanically, so that the universe does {\it not} spontaneously violate $CPT$. We show how $CPT$ symmetry selects a preferred vacuum state for quantum fields on a $CPT$-invariant cosmological background spacetime. The universe before the bang and the universe after the bang may be viewed as a universe/anti-universe pair, emerging directly into the hot, radiation-dominated era we observe in our past. This, in turn, leads to a remarkably economical explanation of the cosmological dark matter. With no additional fields beyond Einstein gravity and the standard model of particle physics (including right-handed neutrinos), a $\mathbb{Z}_{2}$ symmetry stabilizes one of the right-handed neutrinos. We calculate its abundance in detail and show that, in order to match the observed dark matter density, its mass must be $4.8\times10^{8}~{\rm GeV}$. We obtain several further predictions, including: (i) that the three light neutrinos are majorana; (ii) that one of these is exactly massless; and (iii) that, in the absence of an epoch of cosmic inflation, there should be no primordial, long-wavelength gravitational waves. We also briefly discuss the natural origin of the matter-antimatter asymmetry within this picture and possibilities for explaining the cosmological perturbations.

Metadata: arXiv. Abstracts retain their original authors’ rights.

In the conversation

Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels

3 selected excerpts · 3 total mentions

mikhailfranco
Neutral mention · rule
Neil Turok has recently proposed cosmological models based purely on the existing Standard Model with sterile right-handed neutrinos. No new forms of Dark Matter required. One RH neutrino must be massless, and another must be 4.8 x 10^8 GeV. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08930
lamontcg
Neutral mention · rule
> It's quite tiresome to read the same objections as if physicists somehow hadn't thought of them. Okay now do climate change and climatologists. And most people just don't bother to read the article at all it seems. No better than reddit. Changing gears, though, and trying to be more useful, if you want more coverage on this topic there's a note in Peter Woit's blog: https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=13232 Points to another blog which attacks the "nightmare scenario": https://tritonstation.com/2022/11/29/the-angel-particle/ I don't particularly buy that a gravity-only interacting particle "is not physics". If that is what exists, that is what exists. And…
Read the full comment
we've already detected it via dark matter observations. So it is physics. What we can't do is ever really prove it other than by exclusion, but if we racked up a thousand years of failure, we'd have to accept that it was real (hopefully by then not dogmatically and we'd let any kid who wanted to tilt at windmill to go for it). And Woit links to a paper on dark matter being only a right handed majorana neutrino, requiring no real physics beyond the standard model (plus three right handed non-interacting neutrinos): https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08930 And links to a comment on that in John Baez's blog: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2022/12/neutrino_dark_m...

Keep following the thread.

More in Physics

More from the same topics.