Neil Turok has recently proposed cosmological models based purely on the existing Standard Model with sterile right-handed neutrinos. No new forms of Dark Matter required. One RH neutrino must be massless, and another must be 4.8 x 10^8 GeV. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08930
The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter
Latham Boyle, Kieran Finn, Neil Turok
2018 · arXiv
- HN score
- 0
- Mentions
- 3
- Readers
- 3
- Months
- 3
From the abstract
We investigate the idea that the universe before the Big Bang is the $CPT$ reflection of the universe after the bang, both classically and quantum mechanically, so that the universe does {\it not} spontaneously violate $CPT$. We show how $CPT$ symmetry selects a preferred vacuum state for quantum fields on a $CPT$-invariant cosmological background spacetime. The universe before the bang and the universe after the bang may be viewed as a universe/anti-universe pair, emerging directly into the hot, radiation-dominated era we observe in our past. This, in turn, leads to a remarkably economical explanation of the cosmological dark matter. With no additional fields beyond Einstein gravity and the standard model of particle physics (including right-handed neutrinos), a $\mathbb{Z}_{2}$ symmetry stabilizes one of the right-handed neutrinos. We calculate its abundance in detail and show that, in order to match the observed dark matter density, its mass must be $4.8\times10^{8}~{\rm GeV}$. We obtain several further predictions, including: (i) that the three light neutrinos are majorana; (ii) that one of these is exactly massless; and (iii) that, in the absence of an epoch of cosmic inflation, there should be no primordial, long-wavelength gravitational waves. We also briefly discuss the natural origin of the matter-antimatter asymmetry within this picture and possibilities for explaining the cosmological perturbations.
Metadata: arXiv. Abstracts retain their original authors’ rights.
In the conversation
Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels
3 selected excerpts · 3 total mentions
> It's quite tiresome to read the same objections as if physicists somehow hadn't thought of them. Okay now do climate change and climatologists. And most people just don't bother to read the article at all it seems. No better than reddit. Changing gears, though, and trying to be more useful, if you want more coverage on this topic there's a note in Peter Woit's blog: https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=13232 Points to another blog which attacks the "nightmare scenario": https://tritonstation.com/2022/11/29/the-angel-particle/ I don't particularly buy that a gravity-only interacting particle "is not physics". If that is what exists, that is what exists. And…
Read the full comment
we've already detected it via dark matter observations. So it is physics. What we can't do is ever really prove it other than by exclusion, but if we racked up a thousand years of failure, we'd have to accept that it was real (hopefully by then not dogmatically and we'd let any kid who wanted to tilt at windmill to go for it). And Woit links to a paper on dark matter being only a right handed majorana neutrino, requiring no real physics beyond the standard model (plus three right handed non-interacting neutrinos): https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08930 And links to a comment on that in John Baez's blog: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2022/12/neutrino_dark_m...
Found the paper, I think: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08930 CPT = Charge, Parity, Time Does anyone know why "CPT" is written using a different font?
Keep following the thread.
More in PhysicsMore from the same topics.
The Ghost in the Quantum Turing Machine
Scott Aaronson
In honor of Alan Turing's hundredth birthday, I unwisely set out some thoughts about one of Turing's obsessions throughout his life, the question of physics and free will.
Expanding Confusion: common misconceptions of cosmological horizons and the superluminal expansion of the Universe
Tamara M. Davis, Charles H. Lineweaver
We use standard general relativity to illustrate and clarify several common misconceptions about the expansion of the Universe.
Ultimate physical limits to computation
Seth Lloyd
Computers are physical systems: what they can and cannot do is dictated by the laws of physics.
There are no particles, there are only fields
Art Hobson
Quantum foundations are still unsettled, with mixed effects on science and society.