Skip to content
Back to the collection

The Amplituhedron

Nima Arkani-Hamed, Jaroslav Trnka

2013 · arXiv

Read the paper
HN score
0
Mentions
3
Readers
3
Months
3
What’s in a score?

From the abstract

Perturbative scattering amplitudes in gauge theories have remarkable simplicity and hidden infinite dimensional symmetries that are completely obscured in the conventional formulation of field theory using Feynman diagrams. This suggests the existence of a new understanding for scattering amplitudes where locality and unitarity do not play a central role but are derived consequences from a different starting point. In this note we provide such an understanding for N=4 SYM scattering amplitudes in the planar limit, which we identify as ``the volume" of a new mathematical object--the Amplituhedron--generalizing the positive Grassmannian. Locality and unitarity emerge hand-in-hand from positive geometry.

Metadata: arXiv. Abstracts retain their original authors’ rights.

In the conversation

Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels

3 selected excerpts · 3 total mentions

cschmid
Neutral mention · rule
It's a popular science talk, not a presentation of a specific research result. The re-interpretation of scattering amplitudes in terms of novel mathematical structures is almost its own subfield of theoretical particle physics. Most of the specific results he mentioned are described in this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2007
Raro
Neutral mention · rule
The 'Amplituhedron': https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.2007.pdf The idea is to focus on the amplitude of scattering interactions from the momentum-space twistor perspective, rather than perturbations about a point in space-time. For background: Nima made a name for himself by greatly simplifying complex particle interactions, from tens of pages of Feynman diagrams to around a page. I think of the above as an extension of that project. However, I don't recall all the details, as it's been six years since I went to his talk on this.
anigbrowl
Neutral mention · rule
Glad you posted this but that article is a bit user-hostile even for math wikipedia. The relevant paper is relatively approachable if you're a mathematical tourist. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.2007.pdf

Keep following the thread.

More in Mathematics

More from the same topics.

1994arXiv

On proof and progress in mathematics

William P. Thurston

In response to Jaffe and Quinn [math.HO/9307227], the author discusses forms of progress in mathematics that are not captured by formal proofs of theorems, especially in his own work in the theory of foliations and geometrization of 3-manifolds and dynamical systems.

29 mentions21 months
9HN score
2012arXiv

Geometric Algebra

Eric Chisolm

This is an introduction to geometric algebra, an alternative to traditional vector algebra that expands on it in two ways: 1.

11 mentions10 months
3HN score