Skip to content
Back to the collection

Characterizing Quantum Supremacy in Near-Term Devices

Sergio Boixo, Sergei V. Isakov, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy

Show all 9 authors

Ryan Babbush, Nan Ding, Zhang Jiang, Michael J. Bremner, John M. Martinis, Hartmut Neven

2016 · arXiv

Read the paper
HN score
0
Mentions
3
Readers
3
Months
3
What’s in a score?

From the abstract

A critical question for the field of quantum computing in the near future is whether quantum devices without error correction can perform a well-defined computational task beyond the capabilities of state-of-the-art classical computers, achieving so-called quantum supremacy. We study the task of sampling from the output distributions of (pseudo-)random quantum circuits, a natural task for benchmarking quantum computers. Crucially, sampling this distribution classically requires a direct numerical simulation of the circuit, with computational cost exponential in the number of qubits. This requirement is typical of chaotic systems. We extend previous results in computational complexity to argue more formally that this sampling task must take exponential time in a classical computer. We study the convergence to the chaotic regime using extensive supercomputer simulations, modeling circuits with up to 42 qubits - the largest quantum circuits simulated to date for a computational task that approaches quantum supremacy. We argue that while chaotic states are extremely sensitive to errors, quantum supremacy can be achieved in the near-term with approximately fifty superconducting qubits. We introduce cross entropy as a useful benchmark of quantum circuits which approximates the circuit fidelity. We show that the cross entropy can be efficiently measured when circuit simulations are available. Beyond the classically tractable regime, the cross entropy can be extrapolated and compared with theoretical estimates of circuit fidelity to define a practical quantum supremacy test.

Metadata: arXiv. Abstracts retain their original authors’ rights.

In the conversation

Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels

3 selected excerpts · 3 total mentions

comnetxr
Neutral mention · rule
I'm not an expert, but you are correct in that there is no error correction here, and error correction is still a long way off. Around 2016, realizing that running useful quantum algorithms was a long way away and there needed to be earlier roadmarks for quantum devices to signal the progress, the problem of "quantum supremacy" was introduced. The goal is to find the problem with the _easiest_ demonstrable quantum speedup (regardless of usefulness). They proposed a particular sampling problem (running a randomly chosen quantum circuit that has output with a positive probability on many bitstrings, where the exact "speckle pattern" of the probability distribution would…
Read the full comment
only show up if no errors were made when running the circuit.) As the circuit is randomly chosen, it can serve no particular use, except for verification that the computer runs correctly. Relevant papers for more info: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.00263.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.05903.pdf
avz
Neutral mention · rule
I believe they talk about the computational task described in [1] (published in 2016). Note that this is somewhat contrived: it's a task defined specifically so that it is very difficult for classical computers and relatively easy for quantum computers. It is also defined in a way that ensures that a quantum computer necessary to demonstrate quantum supremacy is relatively small in terms of the number of qubits. The task is that of generating output samples from pseudo-random quantum circuits. The paper shows that the task has exponential computational complexity on classical computers and that it can be used to demonstrate quantum supremacy using a quantum computer with approximately 50 qubits. Now, the IEEE Spectrum article indicates that the team has now built a 49-qubit quantum computer and plan to use it to demonstrate quantum supremacy. EDIT: Replaced direct pdf link with the article page link. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00263
Strilanc
Neutral mention · rule
> there are also no real signs that a quantum computer will beat a "classical" computer at anything any time soon John Martinis' group is planning to do that within the next two years [1][2]. Ten years might be realistic for solving useful problems faster and cheaper, but the esoteric speedups are right around the corner. 1: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00263 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgMWommXxU8

Keep following the thread.

More in Physics

More from the same topics.