Skip to content
Back to the collection

Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems

Sculley, D., Holt, Gary, Golovin, Daniel

Show all 10 authors

Davydov, Eugene, Phillips, Todd, Ebner, Dietmar, Chaudhary, Vinay, Young, Michael, Crespo, Jean-François, Dennison, Dan

2015 · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Read the paper
HN score
1
Mentions
3
Readers
3
Months
3
What’s in a score?

In the conversation

Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels

3 selected excerpts · 3 total mentions

starwind
Recommendation · rule
The work Google’s done in NLP has blown me away. It seems like they’ve spearheaded massive improvements 5 or 6 years in a row where computer vision has seen only incremental improvements in that time. I also appreciate their approach to ML ethics where they actually wrestle with some hard problems and come up with some solid approaches that engineers and data scientists can use (in contrast to one pre-print I read where the author—a guy with really good credentials—dogmatically insisted “do not solve problems that would lead to harms.” I’m sure route optimization has led to people having accidents on roads they would not have taken otherwise, should society not have built…
Read the full comment
Mapquest? Google papers (generally) approach these issues with some nuance.) I also constantly recommend this paper a couple of their engineers wrote “Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems” for a real-world approach to implementation and it’s challenges. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2015/file/86df7dcfd896f...
pid-1
Neutral mention · rule
Here's a few I like: Why Do Computers Stop and What Can Be Done About It? https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~remzi/Classes/739/Fall2018/Papers... Not a paper, but the whole book "Accelerate" presents many empirical findings related to automating software operations. Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems - NIPS https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2015/hash/86df7dcfd896fcaf2674f...
kendallpark
Neutral mention · rule
Two cents as an MD-(CS)PhD student studying what I've heard referred to as "the last mile problem." My stack trace of investigation: - The model is good, we just need to get the doctors to trust the model. - The model is good, we need to figure out how to build an informed trust in the model (so as to avoid automation bias). - The model is good, we need informed trust, but we can't tackle the trust issue without first figuring out a realistic deployment scenario. - The model is good, we need informed trust, we need a realistic deployment scenario, but there are some infrastructural issues that make deployment incredibly difficult. After painstaking work with real-life EHR…
Read the full comment
system, sanity-check model inference against realistic deployment scenario. - Holy crap, the model is bad and not at all suitable for deployment. 0.95 AUC, subject of a previous publication, and fails on really obvious cases. My summary so far of "why?": assumptions going into model training are wildly out of sync with the assumptions of deployment. It's "Hidden Tech Debt in ML" [1] on steroids. [1] https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2015/file/86df7dcfd896fcaf2674f...

Keep following the thread.

More in Machine learning

More from the same topics.