Skip to content
Back to the collection

An analog-AI chip for energy-efficient speech recognition and transcription

S. Ambrogio, P. Narayanan, A. Okazaki

Show all 24 authors

A. Fasoli, C. Mackin, K. Hosokawa, A. Nomura, T. Yasuda, A. Chen, A. Friz, M. Ishii, J. Luquin, Y. Kohda, N. Saulnier, K. Brew, S. Choi, I. Ok, T. Philip, V. Chan, C. Silvestre, I. Ahsan, V. Narayanan, H. Tsai, G. W. Burr

2023 · Nature

Read the paper
HN score
0
Mentions
4
Readers
4
Months
4
What’s in a score?

From the abstract

Abstract Models of artificial intelligence (AI) that have billions of parameters can achieve high accuracy across a range of tasks 1,2 , but they exacerbate the poor energy efficiency of conventional general-purpose processors, such as graphics processing units or central processing units. Analog in-memory computing (analog-AI) 3–7 can provide better energy efficiency by performing matrix–vector multiplications in parallel on ‘memory tiles’. However, analog-AI has yet to demonstrate software-equivalent (SW eq ) accuracy on models that require many such tiles and efficient communication of neural-network activations between the tiles. Here we present an analog-AI chip that combines 35 million phase-change memory devices across 34 tiles, massively parallel inter-tile communication and analog, low-power peripheral circuitry that can achieve up to 12.4 tera-operations per second per watt (TOPS/W) chip-sustained performance. We demonstrate fully end-to-end SW eq accuracy for a small keyword-spotting network and near-SW eq accuracy on the much larger MLPerf 8 recurrent neural-network transducer (RNNT), with more than 45 million weights mapped onto more than 140 million phase-change memory devices across five chips.

Metadata: Crossref. Abstracts retain their original authors’ rights.

In the conversation

Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels

4 selected excerpts · 4 total mentions

twobitshifter
Neutral mention · rule
High costs are due to inefficient chips and overpowered models. It’s like we discovered tnt and now we’re using it to weed a garden. The purpose built chips and tpus and pruned models will be cheaper. You can do speech to txt on $10 chip. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06337-5 Imagine this chip for JavaScript.
sigmoid10
Neutral mention · rule
People are working on that [1]. In some sense, it's a step back to analog computing. Add/multiply is possible to do directly in memory with voltages, but it's less versatile (and stable) than digital computing. So you can't do all calculations in a neural network that way, meaning some digital components will always be necessary. But I'm pretty sure analog will make a comeback for AI chips sooner or later. [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06337-5
YetAnotherNick
Neutral mention · rule
No, because NVidia has to work for all the models. Nvidia has other constraints that they need to have for users like instructions, security etc. which openai doesn't have. e.g. As they have a fixed model which they know they would get billions of request to, they could even work with analogue chip which is significantly cheaper and faster for inference. [1] could achieve 10-100x flops/watt for fixed models compared to nvidia for their first gen chip. [1]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06337-5

Keep following the thread.

More in Psychology

More from the same topics.

2018arXiv

Talent vs Luck: the role of randomness in success and failure

A. Pluchino. A. E. Biondo, A. Rapisarda

The largely dominant meritocratic paradigm of highly competitive Western cultures is rooted on the belief that success is due mainly, if not exclusively, to personal qualities such as talent, intelligence, skills, efforts or risk taking.

16 mentions14 months
2.5HN score