> Graham Hancock isn't a reliable source for anything. He was on these. Bluefish Caves and Old Crow Flats were published in Canadian Journal of Archaeology, White Sands in Science, Hartley Mammoth site in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Cerutti Mastodon site and Monte Verde in Nature. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41102194 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41102449 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg7586 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.90379... https://www.nature.com/articles/nature22065 https://www.nature.com/articles/332150a0
A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA
Steven R. Holen, Thomas A. Deméré, Daniel C. Fisher
Show all 11 authors
Richard Fullagar, James B. Paces, George T. Jefferson, Jared M. Beeton, Richard A. Cerutti, Adam N. Rountrey, Lawrence Vescera, Kathleen A. Holen
2017 · Nature
- HN score
- 0
- Mentions
- 3
- Readers
- 3
- Months
- 3
In the conversation
Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels
3 selected excerpts · 3 total mentions
I've been fascinated by this one since visiting the Natural History Museum in San Diego: "A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA" https://www.nature.com/articles/nature22065
> For nearly 2 million years, ancient humans crafted stones into hand-size balls, but archaeologists were unsure why. Wait, for nearly 2 million years ... humans? Starting and ending when? Do we have human remains from more than 2 million years ago? Turkana Boy is 1.5 million years old and close to modern physiology, once you get back to 2 million isn't it australopithicus and such? > That changed when Assaf and her team came across a cache of 30 stone balls in Qesem Cave in Israel, where humans lived from about 400,000 to 200,000 years ago I wonder if 2 million is a typo for 200 thousand? > these stones "might have helped enhance human caloric intake and adaptation in…
Read the full comment
the lower Paleolithic period," (2.7 million to 200,000 years ago), at Qesem Cave and possibly beyond, the researchers wrote in the study. Whew, OK, so 2.7 million years ago is their starting point on this. That's interesting. Who was shaping stones that far back? An interesting other site is the Cerutti Mastodon site in San Diego with 130kYBP mastodon bones possibly crushed with similar stones which were found at the site. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature22065
Keep following the thread.
More in Other researchMore from the same topics.
Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide
Dan Tong, David J. Farnham, Lei Duan +4
Abstract If future net-zero emissions energy systems rely heavily on solar and wind resources, spatial and temporal mismatches between resource availability and electricity demand may challenge system reliability.
How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge
Steven M. Paul, Daniel S. Mytelka, Christopher T. Dunwiddie +4