Skip to content
Back to the collection

Prompt Repetition Improves Non-Reasoning LLMs

Yaniv Leviathan, Matan Kalman, Yossi Matias

2025 · arXiv

Read the paper
HN score
1
Mentions
4
Readers
4
Months
3
What’s in a score?

From the abstract

When not using reasoning, repeating the input prompt improves performance for popular models (Gemini, GPT, Claude, and Deepseek) without increasing the number of generated tokens or latency.

Metadata: arXiv. Abstracts retain their original authors’ rights.

In the conversation

Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels

4 selected excerpts · 4 total mentions

hasteg
Recommendation · rule
Really interesting paper, thanks for the share. The point their making in that paper reminds me of this paper some people shared around work earlier this year, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.14982 (Prompt Repetition Improves Non-Reasoning LLMs)... I wonder how OPs question would fare (or the questions presented in the paper you posted) given double repetition.
sReinwald
Neutral mention · rule
Interestingly, when I apply the "simply repeat the prompt" technique [1], Sonnet 4.6 on the website got it right every time, both with and without extended thinking. Not repeating the prompt got a mix of walk and drive answers. I love how prompt engineering is basically techno-alchemy 1: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.14982

Keep following the thread.

More in Language models

More from the same topics.