Really interesting paper, thanks for the share. The point their making in that paper reminds me of this paper some people shared around work earlier this year, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.14982 (Prompt Repetition Improves Non-Reasoning LLMs)... I wonder how OPs question would fare (or the questions presented in the paper you posted) given double repetition.
Prompt Repetition Improves Non-Reasoning LLMs
Yaniv Leviathan, Matan Kalman, Yossi Matias
2025 · arXiv
- HN score
- 1
- Mentions
- 4
- Readers
- 4
- Months
- 3
From the abstract
When not using reasoning, repeating the input prompt improves performance for popular models (Gemini, GPT, Claude, and Deepseek) without increasing the number of generated tokens or latency.
Metadata: arXiv. Abstracts retain their original authors’ rights.
In the conversation
Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels
4 selected excerpts · 4 total mentions
Actually not surprised. I guess this is for the same reason “say it twice” [1] is working. Because LLm are trained as causal language model, past token cannot attend to future token. One copy of the layer set solve this. [1]https://arxiv.org/html/2512.14982v1
"Prompt Repetition Improves Non-Reasoning LLMs " - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.14982 What instance of ChatGPT are you doing that with? (Reasoning?)
Interestingly, when I apply the "simply repeat the prompt" technique [1], Sonnet 4.6 on the website got it right every time, both with and without extended thinking. Not repeating the prompt got a mix of walk and drive answers. I love how prompt engineering is basically techno-alchemy 1: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.14982
Keep following the thread.
More in Language modelsMore from the same topics.
Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4
Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan +11
Artificial intelligence (AI) researchers have been developing and refining large language models (LLMs) that exhibit remarkable capabilities across a variety of domains and tasks, challenging our understanding of learning and cognition.
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder +28
Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on a specific task.
Design Patterns for Securing LLM Agents against Prompt Injections
Luca Beurer-Kellner, Beat Buesser, Ana-Maria Creţu +11
As AI agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly versatile and capable of addressing a broad spectrum of tasks, ensuring their security has become a critical challenge.
Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools
Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì +5
Language models (LMs) exhibit remarkable abilities to solve new tasks from just a few examples or textual instructions, especially at scale.