Skip to content
Back to the collection

Extreme events reveal an alimentary limit on sustained maximal human energy expenditure

Caitlin Thurber, Lara R. Dugas, Cara Ocobock

Show all 6 authors

Bryce Carlson, John R. Speakman, Herman Pontzer

2019 · Science Advances

Read the paper
HN score
0
Mentions
4
Readers
3
Months
3
What’s in a score?

From the abstract

Maximum sustained energy expenditure in humans is limited by energy intake and strongly tied to event duration.

Metadata: Crossref. Abstracts retain their original authors’ rights.

In the conversation

Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels

4 selected excerpts · 4 total mentions

dp-hackernews
Neutral mention · rule
* Extreme events reveal an alimentary limit on sustained maximal human energy expenditure. "We compiled measurements of total energy expenditure (TEE) and basal metabolic rate (BMR) from human endurance events and added new data from adults running ~250 km/week for 20 weeks in a transcontinental race. For events lasting 0.5 to 250+ days, SusMS decreases curvilinearly with event duration, plateauing below 3× BMR. This relationship differs from that of shorter events (e.g., marathons). Incorporating data from overfeeding studies, we find evidence for an alimentary energy supply limit in humans of ~2.5× BMR; greater expenditure requires drawing down the body’s energy stores. Transcontinental race data suggest that humans can partially reduce TEE during long events to extend endurance." https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.aaw0341
nelgaard
Neutral mention · rule
Yes, those marathon runners mentioned might reduce their TEE from 6200 to 4900 kcal/day. But that is still way more than most office workers eat. And if you check the article: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaw0341# == The reduction in TEE among RAUSA subjects can be partly attributed to marginally reduced body mass and daily mileage (table S3). Still, even after accounting for these changes, Week 20 TEE was 596 kcal/day lower (range, 400 to 923 kcal/day) than expected == So they did loose weight during the marathons and the metabolic compensation is less than half of what you would think reading the original article. == ... The magnitude of metabolic…
Read the full comment
response in RAUSA athletes (~600 kcal/day, ~20% TEE) is similar to the degree of adaptation reconstructed for the most physically active subjects in a recent cross-sectional study (17) and may reflect humans’ maximal capacity for metabolic compensation. == So if 20% percent is the maximum, it means that if you try to outrun your diet, you might have to eventually exercise 25% more. Except by then you will probably have more muscle mass that will burn more calories even when not exercising. And you will be able to exercise more in less time. Suddenly it does not look so hopeless.

Keep following the thread.

More in Other research

More from the same topics.