I truly believe that Bayesian inference is the statistics of the 21st century. Recent advances in MCMC (e.g., NUTS, Stan [1]) and variational inference (e.g., ADVI [2], VAE [3], etc.) + more computing power than ever promise a near future in which Bayesian inference is the default inference engine. Prior distribution is a beautiful and logical mechanism for adding regularization, domain-specific knowledge to our model. [1] Stan, a platform for statistical modeling http://mc-stan.org/ [2] Automatic Differentiation Variational Inference https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.00788 [3] Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Diederik P Kingma, Max Welling
2013 · arXiv
- HN score
- 0
- Mentions
- 3
- Readers
- 3
- Months
- 3
From the abstract
How can we perform efficient inference and learning in directed probabilistic models, in the presence of continuous latent variables with intractable posterior distributions, and large datasets? We introduce a stochastic variational inference and learning algorithm that scales to large datasets and, under some mild differentiability conditions, even works in the intractable case. Our contributions are two-fold. First, we show that a reparameterization of the variational lower bound yields a lower bound estimator that can be straightforwardly optimized using standard stochastic gradient methods. Second, we show that for i.i.d. datasets with continuous latent variables per datapoint, posterior inference can be made especially efficient by fitting an approximate inference model (also called a recognition model) to the intractable posterior using the proposed lower bound estimator. Theoretical advantages are reflected in experimental results.
Metadata: arXiv. Abstracts retain their original authors’ rights.
In the conversation
Original HN comments, with labels from simple text rules. A label describes the whole comment and may miss context or irony. Read the discussion to make up your own mind. About the labels
3 selected excerpts · 3 total mentions
This is the PhD thesis of Durk Kingma [1]. Reading this right now; appears to be a well-written introduction to stuff variational autoencoders [2] and ADAM [3]. [1] http://dpkingma.com/ [2] http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114 [3] http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980
Causality is a bit harder to integrate with current machine learning models as it's hard even with standard probabilistic graphical models. On the other hand, there has been a lot of work integrating deep neural networks with probabilistic models. For example, the variational auto-encoders are a graphical model with Gaussian latent variables whose mean and variance are determined by (deep) neural networks [1]. There has been work exploring the neural network weights as latent variables themselves [2]. Finally, some new developments such as dropout can be interpreted as some form of deep Gaussian processes [3]. I believe there will be a lot further developments on this area in the near-future. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114 [2] http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05424 [3] http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02142
Keep following the thread.
More in Statistics & probabilityMore from the same topics.
Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4
Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan +11
Artificial intelligence (AI) researchers have been developing and refining large language models (LLMs) that exhibit remarkable capabilities across a variety of domains and tasks, challenging our understanding of learning and cognition.
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder +28
Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on a specific task.
Dissolving the Fermi Paradox
Anders Sandberg, Eric Drexler, Toby Ord
The Fermi paradox is the conflict between an expectation of a high {\em ex ante} probability of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe and the apparently lifeless universe we in fact observe.
Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization
Chiyuan Zhang, Samy Bengio, Moritz Hardt +2
Despite their massive size, successful deep artificial neural networks can exhibit a remarkably small difference between training and test performance.